A History of Oxford Research Group

1982 to 2000

Oxford Research Group (ORG) was founded in 1982 at a time of crisis in relations between the Western powers and the Soviet Union, characterised by a renewed nuclear arms race. It began as a series of questions nagging at its founder, Scilla Elworthy. Who are the people who make decisions on nuclear weapons? Do they know of and talk to their opposite numbers in rival countries? What would happen if they discussed their worldview and decisions in discreet engagements with their informed critics?

Frustrated by the opacity of nuclear decision-making and sensing a missed opportunity for more rational debate and policy, Elworthy set about forming a group of researchers to explore these ideas, literally around her kitchen table in Oxfordshire. While informed by Elworthy’s Quakers values, the idea was not to be a pacifist organisation but a bridge between those with radically different ideas on defence and security policy in search of new ideas and alternatives to the status quo.

Over the next decade ORG became a steadily more established and respected organisation, opening-up nuclear decision-making in the United Kingdom, NATO and other nuclear-armed states, securing exchanges between their policy-makers and perfecting the conditions for discreet dialogue between them and civil society. Along the way Elworthy was nominated three times for the Nobel Peace Prize (in 1988, 1989 and 1991) and won the Niwano Peace Prize (in 2003) for her work with ORG. ORG became a registered charity (in 1988) and nuclear arms control became a reality.

During the 1990s ORG continued to focus on nuclear weapons but its work expanded to wider security issues while maintaining its discreet dialogue methodology for peaceful engagement and change. Particularly significant was the unprecedented series of exchanges between top-level British and Chinese military officers and civil servants. Late in the decade, ORG was also influential in exploring and exposing the “subsidy trap” that supported British arms exporters.

2001 to 2014

In mid-2001 ORG began what would become a significant shift in its work with the launch of Prof Paul Rogers’ Global Security Briefings series, exploring the potential for major security challenges from the global margins. Within months, the 9/11 attacks shifted the global agenda onto such issues. ORG has tracked and critiqued the War on Terror response ever since, advocating for a radical shift in security policies away from reactive military responses and towards addressing the structural challenges of inequality, exclusion and violence.

Also in 2001, Elworthy began a project to assess the evidence for conflict prevention policies succeeding in avoiding war. From a seminal report, War Prevention Works, grew a new organisation dedicated to funding grassroots peacebuilding initiatives and in 2003 Elworthy left ORG to run Peace Direct. She continues as a patron and advisor to ORG. Dylan Matthews, who wrote the 2001 report for ORG, returned to Peace Direct as its Chief Executive in 2015 and the two organisations continue to work together.

Between 2004 and 2007 ORG relocated from Oxford to London and also moved further away from its original nuclear brief to establish work in several new sectors. This was the genesis of ORG’s work in the Middle East, pioneered by psychoanalyst Gabrielle Rifkind applying her insights to the established model of discreet dialogue between seemingly intractable opponents. Prof Oliver Ramsbotham, with ORG since its earliest years, also brought has strategic engagement methodology for conflict resolution. ORG has pioneered preventive diplomacy and strategic thinking projects in Israel, Palestine, Egypt, Iran, Syria and Yemen, as well as with many external parties to conflicts in the region.

ORG’s work in support of a nuclear deal between Iran and the international community was particularly influential. Using its networks of senior contacts in Iran, the US, Russia and EU states, ORG quietly built and nurtured relationships at the highest political level and facilitated off-the-record dialogue with Iranian officials involved in the official negotiation and decision-making process. This helped move the frozen negotiations forward and create a vision for what a final resolution deal might look like. This was realised in the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action agreement.

Also established in 2006-2007 was the Sustainable Security Programme, expanding on Paul Rogers’ work on marginalisation, climate change and geopolitics, as well as ORG’s work on recording of casualties in armed conflict. Between 2007 and 2014 ORG’s Every Casualty Programme sought to coordinate and systematise global efforts to enhance the technical, legal and institutional capacity, as well as the political will, for every single casualty of armed conflict throughout the world to be recorded, civilian as well as combatant. Since 2014, Every Casualty Worldwide has pursued this work as a separate organisation.

2015 and beyond

ORG’s current structure took shape in 2017-2018 around the strategic concept of intervention points to help break out of a global cycle of conflict and violence. In early 2017 Gabrielle Rifkind established the independent Oxford Process to continue to work on preventive diplomacy as the latest of ORG’s sister organisations. The Middle East Programme subsequently rebranded as the Strategic Peacebuilding Programme, focused on laying the foundations for effective and lasting conflict resolution through innovative and strategic dialogue and analysis. In 2018 it expanded its work to include the Palestinian diaspora and a major new project on rethinking Yemen’s peace process.

In January 2018 ORG added a new programme, Remote Warfare. Focused on defining smart, strategic interventions that contribute to lasting peace settlements, this is the evolution of the Remote Control Project, hosted by ORG since 2013 and continuing ORG’s mission of increasing the transparency and accountability of the defence sector. Together with the Sustainable Security Programme, which focuses on promoting global environmental, economic and security cooperation to sustain peace, this constitutes ORG’s commitment to breaking out of the cycle of conflict and violence.

Latest

When are we at War?

The UK government does not have working definitions of combat or non-combat. This suggests that the decision on whether a mission is combat or non-combat is left in the hands of political decision-makers who may have an incentive to avoid enhanced scrutiny.
The UK Should Learn from the Transgressions of Australian Special Forces

If greater oversight was given to UK Special Forces it would allow the government to institutionalise lessons learned on the causes of transgressions, as the Australians are currently doing.
The UK Government Needs to Learn that Secrecy is Not the Answer to Increased Litigation

Increasing litigation against the UK Ministry of Defence appears to have reduced the British government’s willingness to publicly justify or explain operations abroad – potentially to the detriment of public trust and the government’s own goals of reducing litigation against it.
Director, Strategic Peacebuilding Programme

ORG is seeking an experienced, Arabic-speaking project manager to lead the strategic direction, growth and diversification of the Strategic Peacebuilding Programme’s projects and funding, managing projects in Palestine and Israel, and overseeing its work on Yemen. Apply by 6pm on Tuesday 2nd October.

The Role of Youth in Peacebuilding: Challenges and Opportunities

Young people are frequently ‘othered’ in discussions about conflict. This is a dangerous practice as youths can play a very positive role aiding peacebuilding in societies recovering from conflict.
Remote Warfare: Lessons Learned from Contemporary Theatres

This report is a first attempt to identify some of the factors that have helped or hindered the UK’s current approach to remote warfare.
ORG's Vision

Oxford Research Group (ORG) is an independent organisation that has been influential for over 35 years in pioneering new, more strategic approaches to security and peacebuilding. Based in London since 2006, ORG continues to pursue cutting edge research and advocacy in the United Kingdom and abroad while managing innovative peacebuilding projects in several Middle Eastern countries.
Weavers of Peace: The Higaonon Tribe in the Philippines

The Higaonon, an indigenous tribe in Northern Mindanao in the southern Philippines, have preserved an ancient system of conflict resolution which has enabled them to be a truly peaceful community. However, there is a need to ensure that this knowledge is not lost in the future.
The UK and UN Peace Operations: A Case for Greater Engagement

This report supports an enhanced role for Britain in UN peace operations and sets out a case for greater engagement.
Making Bad Economies: The Poverty of Mexican Drug Cartels

Some stories say that local economies benefit from cartels in Mexico. But research suggests that the areas most plagued by drug-related violence have seriously suffered economically.
No Such Thing as a Quick Fix: The Aspiration-Capabilities Gap in British Remote Warfare

This report is a first attempt to evaluate the gaps between contemporary strategies and activities in Iraq, Syria and Libya.
The Expanding Role of Chinese Peacekeeping in Africa

China's increased involvement in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping in Africa reflects a broader trend of the country taking a more proactive approach to foreign policy.
Sustainable Security: Global Ideas for a Greater Britain

With the divisive process of leaving the European Union destabilising the UK’s minority government and driving an obsession with redefining a global role for a “Great” Britain, the time is right for political parties of all persuasions to rethink the country’s contribution to global security.
The Politics of Coltan an Interview with Michael Nest

In this interview, Dr. Michael Nest discusses the political, environmental, ethical and social issues surrounding the mining of columbite–tantalite (coltan).