Governance

Oxford Research Group (ORG) is registered as a charity (No. 299436) and as a UK company limited by guarantee (No. 02260840). As such, it is regulated by the Charity Commission for England and Wales and Companies House. Both hold copies of our audited annual accounts, which are publicly available, including through this website.

As a charity, ORG is governed by a Board of Trustees, which has ultimate responsibility for the organisation. The Board normally has 8-10 members and meets quarterly, including an annual general meeting in September. Its constitution is ORG’s Memorandum and Articles of Association (2018), which can be made available on request.

The ORG Board of Trustees also has a Finance and Risk Committee, which meets quarterly to review financial performance and the identification and management of organisational risk. The Committee is overseen by ORG’s Treasurer, who is a Trustee.

Names and profiles of ORG’s current Trustees can be found here.

Funders

Our funding comes from diverse sources, including charitable foundations, individuals, governments, and government-funded institutes and agencies. We only accept sources of funding that allow us to retain our independence and integrity. Read more

Annual reports

A list of ORG's annual reports. Read more

Latest

Report launch - Fusion Doctrine in Five Steps: Creating Routine Fusion in Africa

Please join the Remote Warfare Programme for the launch of our report on the roll-out of the UK’s Fusion Doctrine.

Fusion Doctrine in Five Steps: Lessons Learned from Remote Warfare in Africa

This report on the roll out of the UK’s new Fusion Doctrine in Africa is the first independent assessment of the Doctrine’s potential to tackle instability on the continent.

Infographics: Fusion Doctrine in Five Steps

ORG's research on Fusion Doctrine in Africa summarised in infographics.

The Global Revolts from the Margins

During the past nine months, there have been major episodes of civil unrest in several countries across the globe. Focusing mainly on the recent mass protests in Iraq, Lebanon and Chile, this briefing draws on the concept of “revolts from the margins” to explain these events.

The Role of Youth in Peacebuilding: Challenges and Opportunities

Young people are frequently ‘othered’ in discussions about conflict. This is a dangerous practice as youths can play a very positive role aiding peacebuilding in societies recovering from conflict.

Making Bad Economies: The Poverty of Mexican Drug Cartels

Some stories say that local economies benefit from cartels in Mexico. But research suggests that the areas most plagued by drug-related violence have seriously suffered economically.

ORG's Vision

Oxford Research Group (ORG) is an independent organisation that has been influential for over 35 years in pioneering new, more strategic approaches to security and peacebuilding. Based in London since 2006, ORG continues to pursue cutting edge research and advocacy in the United Kingdom and abroad while managing innovative peacebuilding projects in several Middle Eastern countries.

Remote Warfare: Lessons Learned from Contemporary Theatres

This report is a first attempt to identify some of the factors that have helped or hindered the UK’s current approach to remote warfare.

Weavers of Peace: The Higaonon Tribe in the Philippines

The Higaonon, an indigenous tribe in Northern Mindanao in the southern Philippines, have preserved an ancient system of conflict resolution which has enabled them to be a truly peaceful community. However, there is a need to ensure that this knowledge is not lost in the future.

The Cyprus Problem: Why Solve a Comfortable Conflict?

Several diplomatic efforts have been made both domestically and internationally to enhance peaceful unity since the start of the Cyprus Problem. Despite the shortcomings of past efforts, it is still desirable not only to resolve the issue, but also to do so in a timely manner.

Why Does UN Humanitarian Intervention Remain Selective?

Over the past two decades, the United Nations Security Council has responded more strongly to some humanitarian crises than to others. This variation in Security Council action raises the important question of what factors motivate United Nations intervention.