• warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Name or service not known in /var/www/web185/web/sites/all/themes/org/template.php on line 105.
  • warning: file_get_contents(http://urls.api.twitter.com/1/urls/count.json?url=http%3A%2F%2Foxfordresearchgroup.org.uk%2Fpublications%2Fmaking_casualty_recording_legal_requirement%2Fcasualty_recording_un_security_council%25E2%2580%2599s_op) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Name or service not known in /var/www/web185/web/sites/all/themes/org/template.php on line 105.
  • warning: file_get_contents(http://graph.facebook.com/http://oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/making_casualty_recording_legal_requirement/casualty_recording_un_security_council%E2%80%99s_op) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden in /var/www/web185/web/sites/all/themes/org/template.php on line 115.

Casualty Recording in the UN Security Council’s Open Debate on the Protection of Civilians

  • Share
  • 0
Every Casualty Programme
24 July 2012

The Oxford Research Group, together with the ORG-founded Every Casualty campaign, have been working with states and UN agencies to highlight the need for better casualty recording practices in armed conflict within the context of the 'Protection of Civilians' mandate at the UN Security Council. In response, the issue of recording was raised in the recent debate at the Security Council.

In advance of the day-long debate on Protection of Civilians, held on 25 June 2012 at the UN Security Council, the Every Casualty campaign conducted several bilateral meetings with states and UN Agencies in New York. The campaign also presented to the group of friends on the protection of civilians.

Ahead of the debate, we circulated a lobby sheet, which welcomed the UN Secretary General’s statement on casualty recording and made a number of calls on states. In his latest report on the protection of civilians in May, the Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon, had recognised the need for improved casualty recording, stating that: 

[Casualty] recording can clarify the causes of harm to civilians, as well as the actions needed to end such harm and prevent its recurrence.

Our lobby sheet called on states to:

  • recognise casualty recording’s vital contribution to the protection of civilians
  • acknowledge the lack of casualty recording practice in protection missions while highlighting successful precedents such as UNAMA
  • commit to discussions towards stronger casualty recording in situations of armed conflict

Some 45 countries spoke during the debate, with a number of them explicitly recognising the need for improved casualty recording practices in armed conflict in their statements. This is the first time that the issue of casualty recording methods has been explicitly raised at the Security Council, and this offers a significant new opportunity for making progress on this issue in collaboration with states and inter-state bodies.

Casualty recording was included in the Under Secretary General and Emergency Relief Coordinator’s statement that strongly echoed the Secretary General’s statement and called for more “systematic recording of civilian casualties, combined with regular reporting". 

States such as Portugal, Liechtenstein, Switzerland and Austria explicitly recognised the need for casualty recording as a contributing means to strengthen accountability and compliance with international humanitarian law, as well as improve the overall understanding of the protection of civilians.

Uruguay made the compelling case that the undertaking of casualty recording is “in line with the principles of humanitarian law, primarily by its relationship with some of the most basic values of human dignity, and also for its potential practical benefits such as identifying the cause of harm to civilians”.

The representative from Switzerland, speaking for the Group of Friends on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Liechtenstein, Norway, Portugal, United Kingdom and Uruguay) on casualty recording suggested that as a step forward “the Council’s discussions may benefit from an overview in the next Secretary General's report of existing practices, as well as from specific recommendations on ways to ensure  systemic and reliable data collection in compliance with humanitarian principles” - a statement informed by the briefing given to the group of friends prior to the debate.

The European Union Delegation also explicitly recognised the need for improved casualty recording and welcomed such efforts by AMISOM and ISAF to track civilian casualties. In addition, the speaker for the Office for the High Commission of Human Rights (OHCHR) said that his office supported “the creation of similar mechanisms within the Afghan security forces as an effective means of increasing civilian protection and accountability during the transition to full Afghan control of security. This would allow Afghan forces to perform accurate, professional and timely investigations into all incidents of civilian casualties caused by them and to reduce re-occurrence”. In relation to this France also stated that

such policies (of tallying and identifying civilian victims) could be developed and extended to other missions so as to help identify the harm done to civilians and to enable the security council to respond appropriately.

Many states also recognised the importance of commissions of inquiries conducted by the OHCHR and encouraged that such mandates should be established early on in a crisis in order to prevent further violation and provide the relevant UN agencies with a factual basis for further action. OHCHR also recognised in relation to the commissions that the council can play an important role in enhancing the impact of the work of the commissions, by requesting states and other actors to cooperate with them and making more consistent use of the information and analysis they produce. This relates to the Secretary General's earlier call in November 2010 for the "need to systematically monitor, review and report on the protection of civilians in all relevant situations".

Read more

For an explanation of the linkages between casualty recording and the Protection of Civilian, watch this presentation.

Our publications are circulated free of charge for non-profit use, but please consider making a donation to ORG, if you are able to do so.